My column for the May issue of Builder & Developer magazine is now posted online.
For this issue, entitled "Multi-Generational Housing Goes Mainstream," I wanted to discuss the emerging trend of building homes for multi-generational households. In recent months, the L.A. Times and Fox News have both interviewed me regarding this issue, so I thought this would be an opportune time to provide a more detailed analysis of what's going on. As part of this column, I also interviewed Adrian Foley, President of the Southern California division for Brookfield Homes.
An excerpt:
Over the last year, the concept of multi-generational
housing has been steadily gaining attention from the mainstream press, many of
whom have been focused on the NextGen line of new homes offered by Lennar. Lennar’s NextGen homes offer a ‘home within
a home,’ offering its own private living quarters suitable for everyone from
visiting in-laws or unemployed family members to unrelated tenants helping
chipping in for the mortgage payment.
And yet Lennar is far from the only builder offering this concept, as
variations from builders including Taylor Morrison, The New Home Company and
even affordable housing providers such as Bridge Housing and Jamboree Housing
Corp. have been built.
Although once quite common, the trend of living with
relatives declined with the rise of the suburbs, but is now staging a comeback
due to economic conditions. For example,
the share of multi-generational households approached 25% in 1940 before
steadily dropping to just 12.1% by 1980.
By 2010, however, that share had rebounded back to 18.3%, and, according
to a study by the Pew Research Center, is far higher for minority communities
in which family elders are readily welcomed as active members of the
household. In 2009, 25.8% of Asian households,
23.7% of black households and 23.4% of Hispanic households included multiple
generations versus just 13.1% for white households. It’s also much more common for foreign-born
households (24.6%) versus those born in the U.S. (15.6%). The highest percentage of these households by
age group included those 85 and older (21.5%), 25 to 34 (21.1%) and 55 to 64
(20.9%), which would point to the elderly as well as recent retirees and
boomerang children...
No comments:
Post a Comment