As
recently as early November, most economists were working on their forecasts
assuming things would remain much the same under a Clinton Administration. However, given the stunning Electoral College
victory of Donald J. Trump – perhaps the world’s most famous builder and
developer – most of those prognostications are now simply their best guesses. Indeed, political uncertainty has emerged as the most important externality
impacting not just the U.S. economy, but that of the world as well.
For
2017, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is projecting global growth of 3.4
percent (2.2 percent for the U.S.) versus 3.1 percent in 2016 (1.6 percent for
the U.S.), with this higher growth rate attributed mostly due to greater
stabilization for energy and commodity prices as well as continued low interest
rates.
However, the same forecast is
also mindful of the potential economic fallout from political instability not
just here at home, but also across Western and Eastern Europe, the Middle East
as well as parts of Asia and South America.
So what does that mean for a Trump Administration?
It depends a lot whether or not the new
President takes his own campaign promises seriously or literally.
In
2017, the general prognosis is for another good year for the housing market,
which will also continue to be hamstrung by affordability pressures, high costs
for finished lots, and a shortage of construction labor.
Given that 25 percent of construction jobs
are held by foreign-born workers, stricter immigration policies could worsen
this problem. Much of this impact could
hit the types of starter homes demanded by Millennial buyers, who are expected
to make up about one-third of the overall market.
In
addition, Mr. Trump’s planned fiscal stimulus plans are already being baked
into the financial markets cake, with interest rates for conforming, 30-year
fixed rate mortgage rates rising by over 40 basis points within one month after
November’s election. While that may
require buyers to lower their sights on a certain price range, overall access
to mortgage financing is expected to improve as both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
increase the price of the homes they’ll back, while larger financial
institutions have re-introduced mortgages with as little as one to three
percent down.
Should
Trump reverse the lending regulations required by Dodd-Frank, we would also
expect to see the lending spigot open further, as the onus for foreclosed
mortgages returns to the buyers versus the lenders who made them. Moreover, as interest rates rise and the
percentage of refinancing drops, lenders will be more interested in making up
that shortfall with more purchase loans.
The
year 2017 should also be the start of an important demographic change, in which
more higher-income Baby Boomers are retiring than can be replaced by younger
Millennials moving into the workforce.
We’ll start to see the impact of this over the next five to ten years,
mostly in the form of more Millennials forming new households and buying that
first starter home, many of which could be in more affordable, second-tier
suburbs or cities.
However, given that
demand for new homes may continue to exceed supply for several more years, that
imbalance could continue to push prices up, thus exacerbating affordability
constraints when also taking into consideration higher interest rates.
New
home production will also remain tight by historical terms, as any favorable
changes in national policy will take time to reach the construction site. Even though the national Leading Markets
Index has returned to 98 percent of normal, new home production remains
stubbornly low at about 60 percent of historical norms. While new home inventory did rise by just
over nine percent between October of 2015 and 2016, the inventory timeline
still shrunk from 5.6 to 5.2 months.
For
now, builders are responding to affordability issues by building smaller single-family
homes when possible, with the median size falling by over 1.5 percent to 2402
square feet between the third quarters of 2015 and 2016. At the same time, the median size for
multi-family homes rose by five percent to 1092 square feet, as higher-quality
townhomes, condominiums and apartments offer an acceptable single-family home
substitute for entry-level buyers.
Finally,
today’s greater aversion to risk may also impact the move-up market, especially
if potential buyers with mortgage rates under four percent choose to stay in
place by remodeling instead of leaping up to that next rung on the housing
ladder. In that case, higher interest
rates may trump – pun intended – other factors.
Here’s to a happy and successful 2017!